The Policing Project Commends U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Chatrie v. United States, Urges Lawmakers to Take Action

The Policing Project Commends U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Chatrie v. United States, Urges Lawmakers to Take Action

The Policing Project welcomes today’s decision by the United States Supreme Court in Chatrie v. United States, recognizing that geofence searches — a technique through which law enforcement can access detailed location data from mobile devices present near a crime scene — are indeed a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, and thus require a warrant issued upon probable cause.

New Reports Call for Urgent Guardrails on Emerging DNA Technologies to Protect Civil Liberties, Preserve DNA “Gold Standard”

New Reports Call for Urgent Guardrails on Emerging DNA Technologies to Protect Civil Liberties, Preserve DNA “Gold Standard”

Our new series of reports examines the rapid expansion of powerful DNA technologies that are transforming criminal investigations — while warning that the absence of meaningful regulation threatens civil liberties, public trust, and the long-term legitimacy of forensic DNA analysis.

New Report Finds Current Traffic Enforcement System Fails on Safety and Equity, Calls for Smarter Road Safety Strategies

A new report released today by the Policing Project and the American Civil Liberties Union finds that the United States’ current approach to traffic safety has failed to reduce roadway deaths, while imposing significant financial and human costs on communities.

Op-ed: Guardrails needed for automated license plate readers

Read an op-ed authored by Policing Project counsel Anita Yandle on February 3, 2026 in the Seattle Times. Thanks to a bill before the state Senate, Washington now has the opportunity to join a growing number of states and adopt clear standards that not only protect privacy but also ensure that these powerful tools are used responsibly.

Op-ed: ICE is Failing the Legitimacy Test

Read an op-ed co-authored by Policing Project founder and faculty director Barry Friedman published in the The Atlantic on January 26, 2026. The op-ed argues that that good policing under such robust Second Amendment protections requires having well-trained officers, and transparent and accountable policing -- the opposite of what ICE is modeling right now.

Op-ed: This May Be the Only Path to Accountability for the Minneapolis Shootings

Read an op-ed co-authored by Policing Project founder and faculty director Barry Friedman published in the New York Times on January 26, 2026. The op-ed argues that local and state prosecution may be the “last line of defense for holding the federal government accountable, just as they’ve been since the founding.”

Fossil fuel pipeline protestors ask Oregon court to reinstate lawsuit against domestic surveillance program

Fossil fuel pipeline protestors ask Oregon court to reinstate lawsuit against domestic surveillance program

Protesters that successfully halted the construction of a $10-billion natural gas pipeline and terminal are asking an appeals court to reinstate their lawsuit challenging the state’s unauthorized use of its TITAN Fusion Center to investigate Oregon residents, including to surveil First Amendment-protected activity.

Policing Project Statement on Deployment of the Military In Los Angeles

Policing Project Statement on Deployment of the Military In Los Angeles

The Policing Project condemns the Trump administration’s deployment of the United States military – including the National Guard and U.S. Marines – in the streets of Los Angeles. The use of the military to replace local law enforcement in responding to protests is both anti-democratic and dangerous for public safety. 

Policing Project Commends the Supreme Court’s Unanimous Decision in Barnes v. Felix, Citation to Our Amicus Brief

The Policing Project at NYU School of Law welcomes today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision rejecting the “moment-of-the-threat doctrine” in evaluating claims of excessive force by law enforcement. The Policing Project filed a brief in the case on behalf of nearly two dozen law enforcement leaders, urging the Supreme Court to reach the decision it did.